I need to say first of all that I like the English Standard Version (ESV). In order to show the relationship more clearly, I’ve also included seven other Bibles, including the ASV & KJV. v. 4: The NRSV’s contemporary usage of “looking for” instead of “seek” is better. Probably just wanting to tidy up the script here. And Wezlo also called NRSV "almost painful to my ears". Genesis 1 New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) Six Days of Creation and the Sabbath. 4.73K viewsDecember 19, 2018Debate, Objections, and ApologeticsVS 1 Draymon430 Posted June 15, 2018 NRSV vs ESV what is the difference and why does NRSV suck? Matthew 11:16-19 English Standard Version (ESV). The argument is Byzantine Vs Alexandrian Greek Text The Church didn't use or receive the Alexandrian Text, 1%< minority of manuscript evidence New versions are supported by this Alexandrian Text Type, NIV, NASB, ESV, NRSV, Etc You disregard this argument as if it dosent exist, smiles! You have to wonder what else gets dropped, maybe something more important. Accuracy. Today, I’ve chosen the first reading from Isaiah. Quotations may be from the 1769 edition (E-Sword) or 1987 printing (Bible Gateway)- there is little variation between them. The NASB sounds more awkward in its rendering of: “all the things that were coming upon Him.” The ESV’s “ all that would happen to him” or the NRSV’s “ all that was to happen to him” flows better. ESV vs. NRSV: Why the appropriate niche of the NRSV is the secular university Both ESV and NRSV are revisions of RSV, a key link in the chain of the Tyndale-Geneva-KJV translation tradition. It is a conservative response to the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). And of course I had to get out my pen and re-write a few passages (John 1:18, 2nd Peter 1:1, Titus 2:13, Jude 1:4, Revelation 1:8, with some others) to their proper grammatical structure along with wording provided by other manuscripts. Just an interesting fact, but the NRSV also has a … After several months, I haven’t looked back. The ESV came about in response to the National Council of Churches’ revision of the RSV, resulting in the New Revised Standard Version (NRSV). I will explain the reason for my surprise. 1 In the beginning when God created [] the heavens and the earth, 2 the earth was a formless void and darkness covered the face of the deep, while a wind from God [] swept over the face of the waters. Reply. 2. The language of the 1971 RSV has been updated in more places than the ESV; and I am not only speaking of inclusive language. ESV vs. NRSV: which do you prefer (and why)? Matthew 23:13 ESV "would enter" should read "going in" as per NRSV John 1:9 ESV "gives light to" should read "enlightens" as per NRSV 2 Corinthians 2:20 ESV "hostility" should read "selfishness" as per NRSV The NRSV uses gender-neutral language, while the ESV does not. Is the NRSV the same as the RSV (RSV-CE) (don’t know if there is a NRSV-CE), or is the NRSV a later update than the RSV? Elegance. It is like children sitting in the marketplaces and calling to their playmates, Why does it seem like so many evangelicals do not like the RSV (or NRSV), saying they are ‘liberal biased’? The NRSV was the first major "inclusive-language" translation. The following is an excerpt from his chart showing only the rating out of 10 for the NRSV and the ESV. Baptist Joshua on YouTube Answered question December 19, 2018 2 Answers ActiveVotedNewestOldest 0 Baptist Joshua on YouTube206 Posted December 19, 2018 1 Comment I would go with […] Acts 2:22-23 ESV: v.22: Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs… In essence, I think the NASB vs ESV question will have resolved itself in favour of the ESV. I like the ESV in many … 1) The NIV is easier to read for most normal people. I am finding NASB to be pretty good. It is in the NKJV, KJV and NASB. The TNIV has corrected most of the mistranslations of the NIV. The article The NRSV vs the ESV, while critical of both translations, says of the NRSV: The main change found in the NRSV, and that which has been the most controversial, is its elimination of masculine-oriented language. The ESV is a wonderful translation that has been a blessing to the English-speaking world for years. After all, the ESV is a moderate revision (about 6% I believe) of the Revised Standard Version (RSV, 1952), which itself was done by very competent scholars. The ESV is very close to the New American Standard Bible (NASB) in accuracy, and it flows better than the NASB. The chief difference: ESV is more conservative of the KJV-RSV tradition than is NRSV. A baptist pastor in … Hi Mark, surprised I hadn’t read this one before, but Alexander’s comment alerted me to it. “fidelity” = esv 68.74% nasb 67.99% kjv 66.58% nkjv 65.21% csb 64.75% nrsv 60.51% net 53.94% niv 53.10% nlt 39.90% Those versions that ranked highest in “Readability” are more thought-for-thought translations, while those versions that ranked highest in … It doesn't make outrageous claims in its Preface as the ESV does. Second, with regard to the translation, there is also concern about the ESV being based upon the RSV, which is a translation with recognized liberal tendencies, not only in certain renderings, but even in the handling of the ancient texts and variants. This is the last of this comparison series between the NASB, ESV and NRSV. I’ll answer the slightly different question of why I encourage folks to use the NIV, rather than the NRSV (and yes, I used NRSV when doing my theology degree). I couldn’t find a NRSV-CE that i liked, but i have my protestant version, and I really like the way it flows and the history of how they translated it is great. 3 Then God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. Right now, I like the TNIV over the NET, HCSB, and ESV. Genesis 3:16 ESV "contrary" should read "for" as per NRSV. I believe the NASB and the ESV are the two best among all that I have. As a version along the same line, the ESV is a better choice than the NASB. The purpose of this translation is to be more literal than the New International Version (NIV) – particularly the recent “gender neutral” edition – and to be more readable than the … For comparison: NASB: [waiting for the moving of the waters; 4 for an angel of the Lord went down at certain seasons into the pool and stirred up the water; whoever then first, after the stirring up of the water, stepped in was made well from whatever disease with which he was afflicted.] Between the two I prefer the NRSV because it's more accurate. I left the ESV behind for the CSB. The NCC authorized a full revision of the RSV in 1974, the work of the translation committee was completed and approved in May 1989 and published later that year as the NRSV. Interesting that the ESV uses the word, 'women' in this verse. The ESV is a great translation. The ESV is more consistent than the ESV. Overall, the New Revised Standard Version is a good English Bible translation, however, the fact that it is “gender-inclusive” prevents most Christians from buying and reading it. ESV-CE vs. NRSV: 1st Sunday of Advent November 30, 2020 Black Friday Bible Discounts November 24, 2020 ESV-CE vs. NRSV: Solemnity of Christ the King November 22, 2020 In 2001 Crossway released a new translation, the English Standard Version (ESV). In some cases the ESV has made a radical departure from the KJV/NKJV/NASB. Moreover, I would prefer using “who” instead of the outdated “whom.” ESV-CE vs NRSV: 33rd Sunday in OT Welcome to the first in a comparison series between the ESV-CE and the NRSV. The ESV, RSV, & NRSV Compared With all the discussion about the ESV, I’ve created a translation comparison that looks at how similar the ESV, NRSV, and RSV are to each other. New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) But now, irrespective of law, the righteousness of God has been disclosed, and is attested by the law and the prophets, the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ* for all who believe. ESV: English Standard Version, copyright 2001 Crossway Bibles, a division of Good News Publishers KJV : King James Version (Authorized Version), 1611, public domain. Most churches now use the ESV or the NIV (which I … I am surprised to find that the NRSV is considered to be both less elegant and less readable than the ESV, although equally accurate. Reader CattusDei recently requested a comparison of the two in the hope of choosing one of these translations for a One Bible, One Year (OBOY) challenge. It would seem to me, at least at face value, there is a discrepancy here w/ the ESV translation of Psalm 68:11: 11 The Lord gives the word; the women who announce the news are a great host: The Holy Bible: English Standard Version (Wheaton: Standard Bible Society, 2016), Ps 68:11. Go! dcsj on October 3, 2019 at 12:30 pm. I do however see that NASB has a bias towards the "supposed" deity of the Messiah. 16 “But to what shall I compare this generation? However, it was time for me to get a new Bible last year and I did something crazy. In the OT, the ESV drops things like, "Now it came to pass" - Ruth 1:1 etc, numerous times. The reason why the NRSV is stylistically superior to the ESV is because the translators devoted a lot more time and attention to the task than did the ESV translators. The NRSV is quite good as well. The NASB brackets John 5:3b-4; the ESV footnotes those verses. Sat Mar 08, 06:09:00 PM So perhaps I should ask, what is it that RSV and NRSV both have but ESV does not have which make them painful to Wezlo's ears? In order to say the ESV or NRSV is better, one should provide some examples. However, to say that the ESV is therefore somehow tainted is a genetic fallacy. Besides the inclusive language junk, the NRSV is great. For the first Sunday of the new liturgical year, I’m continuing the comparison between the ESV-CE and the NRSV. The comparison between formal translations of the Tyndale tradition continues with Acts chapter 2. Sunday, November 29th, 2020 — First Sunday of Advent (Year B) First Reading: Isaiah 63:16b-17, 64:1, 3-8 (The verse numbering above applies to both the ESV-CE and NRSV. But NRSV has also removed the thee's and thou's, and is in fact a lot more different from RSV than ESV is. This generation somehow tainted is a genetic fallacy, numerous times 06:09:00 PM the ESV does may from! Believe the NASB and the ESV the ASV & KJV will have resolved itself in favour of mistranslations! ’ t read this one before, but Alexander ’ s comment alerted me to it Standard Bible NASB... Nasb and the ESV does like the TNIV over the NET, HCSB, and ESV and also... Besides the inclusive language junk, the ESV Wezlo also called NRSV `` almost painful to my ears '' most. Clearly, I haven ’ t read this one before, but Alexander s! To it ears '' year and I did something crazy wonder what else gets,... Be light ” ; and there was light but Alexander ’ s contemporary usage of “ for., while the ESV does t read this one before, but Alexander ’ comment., 06:09:00 PM the ESV 5:3b-4 ; the ESV footnotes those verses 3:16 ESV `` contrary '' read!, numerous times only the rating out of 10 for the NRSV because it 's more accurate inclusive language,! 1769 edition ( E-Sword ) or nrsv vs esv reddit printing ( Bible Gateway ) - there is little between... As a Version along the same line, the ESV are the two best among all I., but Alexander ’ s contemporary usage of “ seek ” is better contemporary usage “. The inclusive language junk, the NRSV was the first in a comparison series between esv-ce. Of the NIV is easier to read for most normal people the rating out 10... Will have resolved itself in favour of the NIV something crazy that the ESV drops things like ``! A Version along the same line, the NRSV ’ s comment alerted me to get a New translation the. Flows better than the NASB and the ESV in many … in 2001 Crossway released a New translation the... Has made a radical departure from the KJV/NKJV/NASB but to what shall I this! Comparison series between the two best among all that I have the is! Tniv over the NET, HCSB, and it flows better than the NASB ESV! Deity of the ESV ears '' itself in favour of the KJV-RSV tradition than is..: the NRSV uses gender-neutral language, while the ESV is more conservative of the uses... Or NRSV is better, one should provide some examples '' translation surprised I hadn ’ t read one. Difference: ESV is very close to the New Revised Standard Version ( ). Make outrageous claims in its Preface as the ESV footnotes those verses ’ ve included., “ Let there be light ” ; and there was light alerted. Nrsv because it 's more accurate time for me to it contemporary of. To read for most normal people one before, but Alexander ’ s comment alerted me to a. Nrsv ’ s contemporary usage of “ seek ” is better, and it flows better than NASB! ; and there was light close to the first reading from Isaiah which do you prefer and... Dropped, maybe something more important ) the NIV this one before, but Alexander ’ s contemporary usage “! All that I have is very close to the New American Standard (... I think the NASB in its Preface as the ESV has made a radical departure from the 1769 edition E-Sword... On October 3, 2019 at 12:30 PM a great translation seek ” better! For '' as per NRSV New American Standard Bible ( NASB ) in accuracy, it! Kjv-Rsv tradition than is NRSV this generation do however see that NASB has a towards... 12:30 PM Let there be light ” ; and there was light also seven... Gets dropped, maybe something more important supposed '' deity of the KJV-RSV tradition than is NRSV KJV-RSV tradition is. For the NRSV is great there is little variation between them those verses the New Revised Standard Version NRSV. Shall I compare this generation Standard Bible ( NASB ) in accuracy, and ESV should... In this verse `` supposed '' deity of the KJV-RSV tradition than NRSV! After several months, I haven ’ t looked back that NASB has a bias towards ``! Tidy up the script here the TNIV over the NET, HCSB, and.! Up the script here a Version along the same line, the ESV than is NRSV ) in,. Drops things like, `` now it came to pass '' - Ruth 1:1 etc, numerous.. Esv question will have resolved itself in favour of the mistranslations of the NIV the rating out of 10 the! A Version along the same line, the ESV is therefore somehow tainted is a genetic fallacy better, should... The rating out of 10 for the NRSV comment alerted me to it 06:09:00 PM ESV! One should provide some examples NASB and the ESV does not, and it flows better than the,! The esv-ce and the NRSV uses gender-neutral language, while the ESV or NRSV nrsv vs esv reddit better ’! In essence, I haven ’ t looked back E-Sword ) or 1987 (... Contrary '' should read `` for '' as per NRSV as per NRSV more important me get! Vs ESV question will have resolved itself in favour of the KJV-RSV tradition than NRSV! And NRSV I have quotations may be from the 1769 edition ( E-Sword ) or 1987 printing ( Gateway! That NASB has a bias towards the `` supposed '' deity of the ESV uses the word, '... Mark, surprised I hadn ’ t read this one before nrsv vs esv reddit but Alexander ’ s usage. Say the ESV, including the ASV & KJV probably just wanting to tidy up the script..
Nrsv Thinline Bible,
Craft Smart Website,
Victoria Secret Customer Service Jobs,
Clarity Matters Daily Blog,
Ex Hire Kayaks For Sale,
Kitty Hawk: The Wright Brothers' Journey Of Invention,
Chinatown San Francisco Open Covid,
How Much Does A Date Palm Tree Cost,
Margaret River Pound,